Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(5)2023 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20236167

ABSTRACT

Although SARS-CoV-2 syndrome primarily affects the lungs, systemic manifestations have been reported. New rheumatic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases have been reported following SARS-CoV-2 infection. We present a case of a woman in her mid-30s who developed inflammatory back pain due to bilateral sacroiliitis with erosions after contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection. Her inflammatory markers on presentation were normal. MRI of the sacroiliac joints demonstrated bone marrow oedema and erosive changes in both sacroiliac joints. As the patient was intolerant to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection was administered, which improved her symptoms in 8 weeks. However, due to the drug's side effects, SC adalimumab was switched to intravenous infliximab. The patient is currently tolerating her intravenous infliximab well and has experienced significant improvement in her symptoms. We reviewed the current literature on the prevalence of axial spondyloarthropathy after SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Sacroiliitis , Spondylarthritis , Female , Humans , Spondylarthritis/complications , Spondylarthritis/drug therapy , Spondylarthritis/diagnosis , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Sacroiliac Joint , Sacroiliitis/drug therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pain
2.
Chinese Journal of Dermatology ; 56(1):59-63, 2023.
Article in Chinese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2320690

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate COVID-19 vaccination status and relevant adverse reactions in patients with psoriasis treated with biological agents, and to explore the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on psoriatic lesions. Methods Clinical data were collected from 572 psoriasis patients aged 18-60 years, who were registered in the management system of psoriasis patients treated with biological agents in the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital from May 2019 to June 2021. The COVID-19 vaccination status was investigated by telephone interviews, and the vaccination-related information was obtained by fixed healthcare workers during a fixed time period according to a predesigned questionnaire. Measurement data were compared between two groups by using t test, and enumeration data were compared by using chi- square test or Fisher's exact test. Results The COVID-19 vaccination coverage rate was 43.13%226 casesamong the 524 patients who completed the telephone interview, and was significantly lower in the biological agent treatment group30.79%, 105/341than in the traditional drug treatment group66.12%, 121/183;chi2 = 60.60, P < 0.001. The main reason for not being vaccinated was patients' fear of vaccine safety49.66%, 148/298, followed by doctors' not recommending26.51%, 79/298. In the biological agent treatment group after vaccination, the exacerbation of psoriatic lesions was more common in patients receiving prolonged-interval treatment42.86%, 6/14compared with those receiving regular treatment 4.40%, 4/91;Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001. Skin lesions were severely aggravated in two patients after COVID-19 vaccination, who ever experienced allergic reactions and whose skin lesions did not completely subside after the treatment with biological agents. Conclusions The COVID-19 vaccination coverage rate was relatively low in the psoriasis patients treated with biological agents, and no serious adverse reaction was observed after vaccination. Prolonged-interval treatment due to COVID-19 vaccination ran the risk of exacerbation of skin lesions.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.

3.
Metas de Enfermeria ; 26(3):49-56, 2023.
Article in Spanish | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2312495

ABSTRACT

Objective: to describe the tendency of biological exposures among healthcare professionals during the years 2019-2021. Method: a retrospective descriptive epidemiological study with 400 biological accidents among the staff of the Clínico-Malvarrosa Health Department (Valencia) from 2019 to 2021. The information was collected by the Occupational Risk Prevention Service through the REBA and EOLAS databases. The type of variables collected were: type of accident, setting where it occurred, characteristics of the worker involved, safety measures applied, and serological parameters of source and worker. Results: the distribution of accidents per year was n= 132 in 2019 (33%), n= 121 in 2020 (30.25%) and n= 147 in 2021 (36.75%). The professionals who experienced more accidents in all years were nurses, specifically those with <5 years of experience, 25-to-34-year old, and under temporary contract. The services that reported more accidents were Primary Care and Surgery in all these years, particularly the morning shifts. Over 20% of the staff were not wearing gloves at the time of the accident in any of these three years. There was an increase in the use of face masks from 24% in 2019 to 100% in 2021, as well as an increase in facial protection measures from 0% to 7%. Of these accidents, 96% could be recorded without seroconversion cases among workers exposed in any of these years. Conclusions: apparently, the COVID-19 pandemic has not altered the tendency towards accidental biological exposures among healthcare workers. The most significant fluctuations could be due to the reduction in surgical activity during 2020. © 2023 DAE Editorial, Grupo Paradigma. All rights reserved.

4.
Chinese Journal of Dermatology ; 56(1):59-63, 2023.
Article in Chinese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2306171

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate COVID-19 vaccination status and relevant adverse reactions in patients with psoriasis treated with biological agents, and to explore the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on psoriatic lesions. Methods Clinical data were collected from 572 psoriasis patients aged 18-60 years, who were registered in the management system of psoriasis patients treated with biological agents in the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital from May 2019 to June 2021. The COVID-19 vaccination status was investigated by telephone interviews, and the vaccination-related information was obtained by fixed healthcare workers during a fixed time period according to a predesigned questionnaire. Measurement data were compared between two groups by using t test, and enumeration data were compared by using chi- square test or Fisher's exact test. Results The COVID-19 vaccination coverage rate was 43.13%(226 cases)among the 524 patients who completed the telephone interview, and was significantly lower in the biological agent treatment group(30.79%, 105/341)than in the traditional drug treatment group(66.12%, 121/183;chi2 = 60.60, P < 0.001). The main reason for not being vaccinated was patients' fear of vaccine safety(49.66%, 148/298), followed by doctors' not recommending(26.51%, 79/298). In the biological agent treatment group after vaccination, the exacerbation of psoriatic lesions was more common in patients receiving prolonged-interval treatment(42.86%, 6/14)compared with those receiving regular treatment (4.40%, 4/91;Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001). Skin lesions were severely aggravated in two patients after COVID-19 vaccination, who ever experienced allergic reactions and whose skin lesions did not completely subside after the treatment with biological agents. Conclusions The COVID-19 vaccination coverage rate was relatively low in the psoriasis patients treated with biological agents, and no serious adverse reaction was observed after vaccination. Prolonged-interval treatment due to COVID-19 vaccination ran the risk of exacerbation of skin lesions.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.

5.
Journal of Research in Pharmacy ; 26(6):1513-1526, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2205627

ABSTRACT

Due to the high mortality rate and rapid spread in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the healthcare system used various treatment options. The pathology associated with COVID-19 includes inflammatory responses which ultimately lead to multi-system organ failure or "cytokines storm". Treating COVID-19 at the initial stage of pandemic has become a challenge as there are no medications that have yet been approved by the FDA or other regulatory agencies. There are many medications have been used by the practitioners to combat the severity of the inflammatory responses. This article summarized the repurposed medications that have received attention during the COVID-19 pandemic and provided an outline of the therapeutic agents, which are under clinical trial that may be helpful to treat COVID-19. This article also emphasizes on pharmacist roles and responsibilities during disasters and pandemics and discussed various vaccines undergoing clinical trials currently.

6.
Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol ; : 1-7, 2022 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2166060

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Compared to biological agents, little is known about the impact of sulfasalazine therapy on COVID-19 outcomes in patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the COVID-19 severity in AxSpAs receiving sulfasalazine and biologic-agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 219 SARS-CoV-2 positive AxSpA patients were retrospectively analyzed. COVID-19 pneumonia, hospitalization rate, and length of stay were used to determine COVID-19 severity. AxSpA patients were mainly grouped and compared as sulfasalazine and non-sulfasalazine. Afterward, we excluded no-treatment patients to reveal the drug's effects more clearly and regrouped AxSpA patients as sulfasalazine-monotherapy (34.3%), biologic-monotherapy (33.7%), and sulfasalazine + biologic (7.3%). RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent of the patients were male and the mean age was 45.0 years. Peripheral arthritis was 35% and uveitis 15%. In total, 41.5% of them have received sulfasalazine and 41.0% biologic agents, and the remaining patients with no AxSpA-specific treatment. In the first comparison, the sulfasalazine group had a higher age, more frequent COVID-19 pneumonia, hospitalization, and longer hospitalization than a non-sulfasalazine group. In the pairwise comparison of 3 treatment groups, the demographic and clinical features, the hospitalization rate and the length of hospital stay were similar but the sulfasalazine-monotherapy group had a higher frequency of COVID-19 pneumonia than the biologic-monotherapy group (23% vs. 7%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our results imply sulfasalazine may be related to more severe COVID-19 in AxSpA patients. These patients should be followed more carefully in the presence of COVID-19, regardless of reasons such as age, comorbidity, and extra-axial disease, and consideration of discontinuing sulfasalazine maybe even thought.

7.
Journal of Research in Pharmacy ; 26(6):1513-1526, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2146291

ABSTRACT

Due to the high mortality rate and rapid spread in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the healthcare system used various treatment options. The pathology associated with COVID-19 includes inflammatory responses which ultimately lead to multi-system organ failure or "cytokines storm". Treating COVID-19 at the initial stage of pandemic has become a challenge as there are no medications that have yet been approved by the FDA or other regulatory agencies. There are many medications have been used by the practitioners to combat the severity of the inflammatory responses. This article summarized the repurposed medications that have received attention during the COVID-19 pandemic and provided an outline of the therapeutic agents, which are under clinical trial that may be helpful to treat COVID-19. This article also emphasizes on pharmacist roles and responsibilities during disasters and pandemics and discussed various vaccines undergoing clinical trials currently. Copyright © 2022 Marmara University Press.

8.
Biomedicines ; 10(8)2022 Aug 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1997514

ABSTRACT

The environmental conditions generated by war and characterized by poverty, undernutrition, stress, difficult access to safe water and food as well as lack of environmental and personal hygiene favor the spread of many infectious diseases. Epidemic typhus, plague, malaria, cholera, typhoid fever, hepatitis, tetanus, and smallpox have nearly constantly accompanied wars, frequently deeply conditioning the outcome of battles/wars more than weapons and military strategy. At the end of the nineteenth century, with the birth of bacteriology, military medical researchers in Germany, the United Kingdom, and France were active in discovering the etiological agents of some diseases and in developing preventive vaccines. Emil von Behring, Ronald Ross and Charles Laveran, who were or served as military physicians, won the first, the second, and the seventh Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for discovering passive anti-diphtheria/tetanus immunotherapy and for identifying mosquito Anopheline as a malaria vector and plasmodium as its etiological agent, respectively. Meanwhile, Major Walter Reed in the United States of America discovered the mosquito vector of yellow fever, thus paving the way for its prevention by vector control. In this work, the military relevance of some vaccine-preventable and non-vaccine-preventable infectious diseases, as well as of biological weapons, and the military contributions to their control will be described. Currently, the civil-military medical collaboration is getting closer and becoming interdependent, from research and development for the prevention of infectious diseases to disasters and emergencies management, as recently demonstrated in Ebola and Zika outbreaks and the COVID-19 pandemic, even with the high biocontainment aeromedical evacuation, in a sort of global health diplomacy.

9.
Klin Lab Diagn ; 67(7): 414-422, 2022 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1995036

ABSTRACT

One of the most important requirements for the personnel of microbiological laboratories working with pathogenic and infectious agents is the observance of precautionary measures and the implementation of a set of preventive measures, collectively interpreted as biological safety (biosafety). To a large extent, biosafety problems are also relevant for all clinical laboratories working with biosubstrates, with the potential threat of containing pathogens of bloodborne infections in them. On December 30, 2020, the President of the Russian Federation signed Federal Law № 492 «On the Biological Safety of the Russian Federation¼ (№ 492-FZ), which regulates the basic legal norms and regulation of biosafety issues, as well as a list of measures to prevent the risks of the spread of infections due to accidents, bioterrorist acts and sabotage. The current pandemic of the coronavirus infection COVID-19 has demonstrated, on the one hand, the epidemiological vulnerability of the single world space, and on the other hand, the decisive influence of biological emergencies on the emergence of negative political and economic processes in the world community. In this regard, the issues of ensuring biosafety in the work of microbiological laboratories in the context of protecting personnel and the environment from accidental or unintentional spread of infections are relevant. Working with pathogenic biological agents in microbiological laboratories is constantly associated with the risk of accidents and possible laboratory infection (laboratory-acquired infections) of employees, environmental pollution if the requirements of regulatory documents on biological safety are not met. In accordance with the requirements of № 492-FZ, in order to prevent biological threats, it is necessary to create a system for monitoring biological risks in microbiological laboratories when working with any infected material.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Laboratory Infection , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Containment of Biohazards , Humans , Laboratories , Laboratory Infection/epidemiology , Laboratory Infection/prevention & control , Pandemics
10.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2452: 395-439, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1844278

ABSTRACT

In this chapter, we discuss potential incidents associated with SARS-CoV-2 experimental work in high containment research laboratories. The risk landscape in high containment laboratories is changing due to the strong innovation drive of the life sciences research. Thus, the WHO has recommended life sciences organizations to incorporate good research practices and ethical principles into a risk-based approach of the biorisk management (BRM). Currently, BRM systems in high containment laboratories are predominantly steered by operational personnel and laboratory professional. It is well known that without having a systematic approach and leadership support from the organization, the BRM system in the high containment laboratory will not be sustainable. Even though the roles of organizations and their leadership in establishing the BRM system are spelt out in many international standards, guidance documents and national legislations, operational aspects of these roles are rarely discussed.It is therefore important for everyone to understand about their roles in organizational processes (communication, decision, and performance evaluation) involved in implementation of BRM related operational activities. In this chapter, discussion is based on operational activities of four main organizational behaviors that are considered to have strengthened BRM systems in high containment laboratories: (1) displaying a visible commitment and support to the BRM system from different levels of management, (2) developing a competent and responsible workforce with BRM technical skills and problem identification/solving skills, (3) integrating learning and improvement principles into the BRM system, and (4) enhancing the continuous motivation of laboratory personnel to avoid complacency. The categorization of these organizational behaviors is based on the International Atomic Energy Agency's principles and guidance for strengthening the safety and security culture in nuclear facilities. Furthermore, we encourage the laboratory management to identify gaps in processes and activities related to those organizational behaviors so that one could rapidly address biosafety and biosecurity vulnerabilities in high containment laboratories.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Laboratories , Biological Factors , Containment of Biohazards , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Drugs Context ; 102021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1811227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic introduced new challenges in several dimensions in healthcare services. Herein, we describe the real-life strategies and therapeutic options adopted by dermatologists regarding their patients with psoriasis being treated with or with an indication for systemic therapy during the first COVID-19 lockdown period in Portugal. METHODS: The study involves a web-based survey on the clinical management of systemic therapy for psoriasis during the COVID-19 pandemic administered to Portuguese dermatologists. The survey consisted of 55 questions (4 open-ended questions; 51 closed-ended questions), grouped into 6 sections. RESULTS: A total of 60 dermatologists voluntarily participated in this survey. Nearly 63% of the participants opted for suspending biologics during the COVID-19 lockdown period and 23.3% increased the time between drug administrations. Eighty percent of the participants agreed that biologics did not change the probability of acquiring COVID-19 and 58.4% believed that these drugs decreased or did not change the severity of the disease. Approximately one-third of the participants opted not to prescribe a biological agent in patients despite clinical indication over the duration of the pandemic. Nearly 25% of the participants opted for suspending traditional immunosuppressant administration. Virtual appointments were an option for 93.3% of the participants. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the management of patients with psoriasis being treated with or with an indication for systemic therapy. Some of the decisions made during the first lockdown period were contrary to what we know today. These decisions might have had a significant impact on patients' quality of life and on future therapeutic success. An adequate interpretation and analysis of the available data will be extremely important to an insightful adaptation of the clinical practice in future confinement or restrictive scenarios.

12.
Biomedicines ; 10(4)2022 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1776130

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has raised concerns in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), not only due to consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 itself but also as a possible cause of IBD relapse. The main objective of this study was to assess the role of SARS-CoV-2 in IBD clinical recurrence in a cohort of patients undergoing biological therapy. Second, we evaluated the difference in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the start and end of the follow-up period (ΔCRP) and the rate of biological therapy discontinuation. Patients with IBD positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with non-infected patients. IBD recurrence was defined as the need for intensification of current therapy. We enrolled 95 IBD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and 190 non-infected patients. During follow-up, 11 of 95 (11.6%) SARS-CoV-2-infected patients experienced disease recurrence compared to 21 of 190 (11.3%) in the control group (p = 0.894). Forty-six (48.4%) SARS-CoV-2-infected patients discontinued biological therapy versus seven (3.7%) in the control group (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, biological agent discontinuation (p = 0.033) and ΔCRP (p = 0.017), but not SARS-CoV-2 infection (p = 0.298), were associated with IBD recurrence. SARS-CoV-2 infection was not associated with increased IBD recurrence rates in this cohort of patients treated with biological agents.

13.
National Technical Information Service; 2020.
Non-conventional in English | National Technical Information Service | ID: grc-753596

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus brings into stark relief extant inadequacies in both national and global biosecurity preparedness for, and coordinated response to, novel biological risks, threats, and harms. Although there has been much deliberation on bioevents, such discourse has most often been agent-centric and reactive to advancements of adversarial threats. While sound, these approaches have failed to fully anticipate a variety of needs. To stay ahead of the broad scope of threats is to accept the fleeting nature of dominance, envision futures of contested or lost dominance, and prepare plans for rapid transformation of capabilities and deployment. Indeed, this pandemic has revealed gaps in national infrastructures and functions that are necessary to ensure surveillance, accurate and reliable information transfer, and coordination and mobilization of existing resources, goods, and services that are essential to prompt, effective, and sustained response. One can defensibly argue that intelligence and deterrence of chemical, radiological, nuclear, and explosive risks and threats have been well maintained by intra- and international cooperation of various agencies and organizations as well as by the foci, scope, and tenor of international signatory treaties and weapons conventions.

14.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(12)2021 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1566338

ABSTRACT

We describe two young cases of reactive haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) with the resultant stress cardiomyopathy in the setting of underlying autoimmune diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Still's disease. The initial presentation was similar in both cases with fever, hyperinflammatory response, hypotension (vasoplegia), bicytopenia and hyperferritinemia. Despite standard of care and multiple broad-spectrum antibiotics, both cases remained pyrexic and were ultimately admitted to the intensive therapy unit to treat cardiogenic shock. Echocardiogram of both cases showed low ejection fraction, the cause for which was not found until the final diagnosis of HLH was made. Both cases made a complete clinical and cardiac recovery following the initiation of high-dose glucocorticoids and anakinra.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic , Macrophage Activation Syndrome , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy , Autoimmune Diseases/complications , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Humans , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/therapeutic use , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/complications , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/drug therapy , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy/drug therapy
15.
Polymers (Basel) ; 13(22)2021 Nov 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1538450

ABSTRACT

In the context of imminent threats concerning biological and chemical warfare agents, the aim of this study was the development of a new method for biological and chemical decontamination, employing non-toxic, film-forming, water-based biodegradable solutions, using a nano sized reagent together with bentonite as trapping agents for the biological and chemical contaminants. Bentonite-supported nanoparticles of Cu, TiO2, and Ag were successfully synthesized and dispersed in a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/glycerol (GLY) aqueous solution. The decontamination effectiveness of the proposed solutions was evaluated by qualitative and quantitative analytical techniques on various micro-organisms, with sulfur mustard (HD) and dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) as contaminants. The results indicate that the peelable active nanocomposite films can be successfully used on contaminated surfaces to neutralize and entrap the hazardous materials and their degradation products. Mechanical and thermal characterization of the polymeric films was also performed to validate the decontamination solution's potential as peelable-film generating materials. The removal efficacy from the contaminated surfaces for the tested micro-organisms varied between 93% and 97%, while for the chemical agent HD, the highest decontamination factor obtained was 90.89%. DMMP was almost completely removed from the contaminated surfaces, and a decontamination factor of 99.97% was obtained.

16.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 17(9): 491-493, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1510266

ABSTRACT

SARS-COV-2 infection has spread worldwide since it originated in December 2019, in Wuhan, China. The pandemic has largely demonstrated the resilience of the world's health systems and is the greatest health emergency since World War II. There is no single therapeutic approach to the treatment of COVID-19 and the associated immune disorder. The lack of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) has led different countries to tackle the disease based on case series, or from results of observational studies with off-label drugs. We as rheumatologists in general, and specifically rheumatology fellows, have been on the front line of the pandemic, modifying our activities and altering our training itinerary. We have attended patients, we have learned about the management of the disease and from our previous experience with drugs for arthritis and giant cell arteritis, we have used these drugs to treat COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Physician's Role , Rheumatologists , Autoimmune Diseases/complications , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Education, Medical, Graduate , Fellowships and Scholarships , Global Health , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Opportunistic Infections/complications , Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Opportunistic Infections/immunology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Rheumatic Diseases/complications , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Rheumatologists/education , Rheumatologists/organization & administration , Rheumatology/education , Rheumatology/methods , Rheumatology/organization & administration , Spain/epidemiology
17.
Toxins (Basel) ; 13(10)2021 09 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1481004

ABSTRACT

Despite the awareness that work in the sewage treatment plant is associated with biological hazards, they have not been fully recognised so far. The research aims to comprehensively evaluate microbiological and toxicological hazards in the air and settled dust in workstations in a sewage treatment plant. The number of microorganisms in the air and settled dust was determined using the culture method and the diversity was evaluated using high-throughput sequencing. Endotoxin concentration was assessed with GC-MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) while secondary metabolites with LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry). Moreover, cytotoxicity of settled dust against a human lung epithelial lung cell line was determined with the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay and UHPLC-Q-ToF-UHRMS (ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry) analysis was performed to determine the source of cytotoxicity. The total dust concentration in the sewage treatment plant was low and ranged from 0.030 mg m-3 to 0.044 mg m-3. The highest microbiological contamination was observed in sludge thickening building and screenings storage. Three secondary metabolites were detected in the air and sixteen in the settled dust. They were dominated by compounds typical of lichen and plants and Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium genera mould. The settled dust from the sludge thickening building revealed high cytotoxicity to human lung epithelial cells A-549 (IC50 = 6.98 after 72 h). This effect can be attributed to a biocidal compound-didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC-C10) and seven toxic compounds: 4-hydroxynonenal, carbofuran, cerulenin, diethylphosphate, fenpropimorph, naphthalene and onchidal. The presence of DDAC-C10 and other biocidal substances in the sewage treatment plant environment may bring negative results for biological sewage treatment and the natural environment in the future and contribute to microorganisms' increasing antibiotics resistance. Therefore, the concentration of antibiotics, pesticides and disinfectants in sewage treatment plant workstations should be monitored.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/analysis , Dust/analysis , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Waste Disposal, Fluid , Aerosols/toxicity , Air Microbiology , Cell Line , Disinfectants/analysis , Endotoxins/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Humans , Sewage/chemistry , Sewage/microbiology , Water Purification
18.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(8)2021 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1373953

ABSTRACT

A 39-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab was admitted to our hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia. Despite receiving dexamethasone, she developed hypoxaemia and persistent lung opacities. As bronchoalveolar lavage was suggestive of cryptogenic organising pneumonia, high-dose corticosteroid was administered, and she received antimicrobial therapy for opportunistic infections without improvement. Reverse transcription PCR was repeatedly positive for SARS-CoV-2, and virus replication was confirmed in cell cultures. As no anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected more than 100 days after symptom onset, she was treated with convalescent plasma with fast clinical improvement, returning home days later. Our case shows that persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection in an immunocompromised patient may be overturned with the appropriate treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Adult , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Immunocompromised Host , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Serotherapy
19.
Asthma Res Pract ; 7(1): 9, 2021 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1311256

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), provoked the most striking international public health crisis of our time. COVID-19 can cause a range of breathing problems, from mild to critical, with potential evolution to respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Elderly adults and those affected with chronic cardiovascular, metabolic, and respiratory conditions carry a higher risk of severe COVID-19. Given the global burden of asthma, there are well-founded concerns that the relationship between COVID-19 and asthma could represent a "dangerous liaison".Here we aim to review the latest evidence on the links between asthma and COVID-19 and provide reasoned answers to current concerns, such as the risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or severe COVID-19 stratified by asthmatic patients, the contribution of type-2 vs. non-type-2 asthma and asthma-COPD overlap to the risk of COVID-19 development. We also address the potential role of both standard anti-inflammatory asthma therapies and new biological agents for severe asthma, such as mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab, on the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes.

20.
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd ; 169(12): 1167-1170, 2021.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1300441

ABSTRACT

Training periods in healthcare and free welfare settings are frequently obligatory. Temporary trainees frequently lack sufficient knowledge regarding hygiene and prevention of infections. Therefore, specific preventive measures for trainees need to be implemented in a standardized fashion, similar to those applied for permanent employees. These are legally regulated by the European Biological Agents Ordinance and the German Standing Committee on Vaccinations (STIKO) recommendations. Criteria regarding immunization against hepatitis A and B, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, polio, influenza and COVID-19 are described. Immunization gaps should be closed at any opportunity in general (e.g. in adolescents during regular physician contacts) and specifically in medical students during the first semester and in other healthcare trainees before the start of the training period. Furthermore, individual introduction of trainees to their work areas and in particular education in health measures to protect themselves and also individuals under their care is of high importance. Education should include information on the potential risks of infection, hand hygiene practice and other personal protection measures.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL